• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D General D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?

A WizKids miniature reveals the iconic character's face for the first time.

Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.27.52.png


The Dungeons & Dragons Red Box, famously illustrated by Larry Elmore in 1983, featured cover art of a warrior fighting a red dragon. The piece is an iconic part of D&D's history.

WizKids is creating a 50th Anniversary D&D miniatures set for the D&D Icons of the Realms line which includes models based on classic art from the game, such as the AD&D Player's Handbook's famous 'A Paladin In Hell' piece by David Sutherland in 1978, along with various monsters and other iconic images. The set will be available in July 2024.

Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.31.00.png

paladininhell.jpg

Amongst the collection is Elmore's dragon-fighting warrior. This character has only ever been seen from behind, and has never been named or identified. However, WizKids’ miniature gives us our first look at them from the front. The warrior is a woman; the view from behind is identical to the original art, while the view from the front--the first time the character's face has ever been seen--is, as WizKids told ComicBook.com, "purposefully and clearly" a woman. This will be one of 10 secret rare miniatures included in the D&D Icons of the Realms: 50th Anniversary booster boxes.


redboxwarriormini.png




s-l1600.jpg

The original artist, Larry Elmore, says otherwise. (Update—the linked post has since been edited).

It's a man!

Gary didn't know what he wanted, all he wanted was something simple that would jump out at you. He wanted a male warrior. If it was a woman, you would know it for I'm pretty famous for painting women.

There was never a question in all these years about the male warrior.

No one thought it was a female warrior. "Whoever thought it was a female warrior is quite crazy and do not know what they are talking about."

This is stupid. I painted it, I should know.
- Larry Elmore​

Whether or not Elmore's intent was for the character to be a man, it seems that officially she's a woman. Either way, it's an awesome miniature. And for those who love the art, you can buy a print from Larry Elmore's official website.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

I don't think he's being sexist. He's stating that when he painted, he thought of the subject as a man. Difficult to dispute this statement, IMHO. Now, since the face was never shown (and obviously the character is fictional), WizKid has decided on a new interpretation, which of course is perfectly valid.
I don’t think he intends to be sexist, but particularly that last quote of his comes off not the best.
 


MNblockhead

A Title Much Cooler Than Anything on the Old Site
I think it is pretty cool. Would have been cool if they offered both a male and female version, but I suppose that may not have made financial sense. I can understand the original artist taking some umbrage over a revision of his original artistic vision, but the over the top reaction is a bad look. Could have just as easily have written:

Gary didn't know what he wanted, all he wanted was something simple that would jump out at you. He wanted a male warrior. It was always seen as a man and was not in the style of how I've generally portrayed women in my D&D art.

There was never a question in all these years about the male warrior, but the art has been released to the larger D&D community. If folks want to re-envision the character as a woman they are entitled to do so. Either way s/he isn't someone I would want to mess with. But my bet is still on the dragon.

Too bad this is going to become a needless culture-war distraction. There are much more important debates to be had, such as depiction of spectacles in the 2024 PHB wizard art. ;-)
 
Last edited:

Elmore says he painted it as a male and is disappointed.

As a fan of the picture, I am disappointed in WotC. Yeah the sex doesn't matter and yes I love getting a new female barbarian mini (yes i plan to buy it) but this seems like an "ask the artist" situation. But WotC gonna WotC.
Well, I disagreed with your assessment, do we even even know this was WOTC at work and not WizKid?
 

bmfrosty

Explorer
Being entirely serious, I think Wizkids/WotC took fantastic artistic license there, and they could have also done two versions of the mini. Honestly, it's beefy enough that they probably would have had to give it a beard to make it seem more masculine. As it is, it can just be male with huge pecs.
 


Elmore says he painted it as a male and is disappointed.

As a fan of the picture, I am disappointed in WotC. Yeah the sex doesn't matter and yes I love getting a new female barbarian mini (yes i plan to buy it) but this seems like an "ask the artist" situation. But WotC gonna WotC.
See, for me, as a fan of the picture, I’m encouraged by this. I Always like taking old things and looking at them in new way. That’s a huge fun of D&D for me.
 

CleverNickName

Limit Break Dancing (He/They)
Huh. Interesting.

I always thought it was the same Warrior on all of the boxed sets:

1715121371490.png


1715121289666.png


1715121310371.png


1715121346895.png


The boxed sets take you from Level 1 all the way to Level 36, so I figured that was what the artist was trying to illustrate on the covers: the Warrior's gear gets better, the dragons get larger, and the background gets broader and more fantastic as the levels of the game increase.

I guess that's why I've always assumed it was a male warrior, because on the cover of the final boxed set we can see the warrior's "final form," a king riding a gold dragon. That was my own interpretation, anyway.

I'm not wounded by someone else interpreting the artwork differently, though. Women are warriors too.
 
Last edited:

Huh. Interesting.

I always thought it was the same Warrior on all of the boxed sets:

View attachment 361839

View attachment 361836

View attachment 361837

View attachment 361838

You know, that whole "progressing from zero to hero" thing? I guess that's why I always assumed it was a male warrior, because on the cover of the final boxed set, you see the warrior's "final form," a king riding a dragon. That was my own interpretation, anyway.

I'm not wounded by someone else interpreting the artwork differently, though. Women are warriors too.
Can’t believe I never thought about it being the same warrior - makes some sense
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top