Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Looking Back At Chaosium's Stormbringer Role-Playing Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christopher Helton" data-source="post: 7708030" data-attributes="member: 6804772"><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]80676[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>After some online conversations on social media, I decided that I should talk about a few older games and supplements in my column here. I ran a <a href="https://twitter.com/dorkland/status/816386640289599488" target="_blank">Twitter poll with some options</a>, some of which I may visit in future pieces, and <strong>Stormbringer</strong> came out as a pretty dominating choice. The game took the lead, and kept it throughout the duration of the poll. So, I hauled a couple of <strong>Stormbringer</strong> pieces out of my library: the second printing of the first edition <strong>Stormbringer</strong> boxed set put out by <strong>Chaosium</strong>, and the "third edition" book put out by <strong>Games Workshop</strong> in the UK.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]80678[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>When I put up the poll, I figured that <strong>Ghostbusters</strong> would win, hands down. I know that <strong>Stormbringer</strong> is a solid game, but I figured that <strong>Ghostbusters</strong> would have the more dedicated audience. Considering that both games were the result of the design team at <strong>Chaosium</strong>, either would have been a win to talk about.</p><p></p><p><strong>Stormbringer</strong> came out from <strong>Chaosium</strong> in 1981, with the idea to adapt Michael Moorcock's seminal fantasy anti-hero to role-playing games. In 1977, <strong>Chaosium</strong> had already produced a licensed board/war game based on the setting and the character of Elric, and looked to expand their license into RPGs.</p><p></p><p>What was an inspired choice was that, along with in-house designer Steve Perrin, they reached out to <strong>Tunnels & Trolls</strong> creator Ken St. Andre to work on the new game. It was an inspired choice because St. Andre really wasn't known for dark role-playing games. Where Moorcock's Elric stories were apocalyptic in tone, and for a long time the standard bearer for the dark fantasy sub-genre, <strong>Tunnels and Trolls</strong> isn't. This isn't a knock on <strong>Tunnels & Trolls</strong>, or St. Andre's work. <strong>T&T</strong> is a great game, and the first edition of it was remarkable in a number of ways, but it isn't the game that springs to your lips when looking for rules to run a dark fantasy campaign.</p><p></p><p>Is this collaboration what made <strong>Stormbringer</strong> into a game that still gets talked about 35 years later? I think that it is. St. Andre definitely looks at game systems in a different way than a lot of other game designers (yes, this is a compliment) and I think that this perspective is what helped to give the game such a strong foundation. St. Andre and Perrin could have simply reprinted the <strong>Runequest</strong> rules with some references to the Young Kingdoms of Elric's world and sat back, waiting for the money to come in. The fact that they didn't shows their strengths as designers.</p><p></p><p>When an RPG publisher has a house system, it is easy enough to just slap a new coat of paint onto it, and sell it as a new game. You see this all the time with licensed role-playing games, particularly at the height of the <strong>D20</strong> boom. <strong>Stormbringer</strong> wasn't a huge divergence from the core of the <strong>Basic Role-Playing</strong> rules, but they took an already simplified set of rules and streamlined them a bit more, particularly in character creation, to make a ruleset that is somewhat different from the main stream.</p><p></p><p>Mechanically, <strong>Stormbringer</strong> is based on the <strong>Runequest</strong> rules. The basics of character creation (i.e. the attributes used), the working of skills and the rules for task resolution are the same. In theory you could migrate characters between your <strong>Stormbringer</strong> and <strong>Runequest 2</strong> games, but you would likely run into a few problems with that when you came to magic.</p><p></p><p>Despite the existence of gods, sentient runeblades, Animal Lords and extradimensional elemental creatures, the worlds of <strong>Stormbringer</strong> aren't particularly magical places, at least not in the way that fantasy role-playing games tend to look at magic. You don't have clerical spellcasting and healing magic. You don't actually have magic-using spell casters at all. The magic in <strong>Stormbringer</strong> is built around the idea of summoning extradimensional beings, whether chaos demons or elemental beings, and either channeling their power into some sort of spell-like function, or binding them into items that protect the user or allows some access to the bound creature's powers. You could do something like a fireball in a <strong>Stormbringer</strong> game, it would just take summoning a fire elemental and "throwing" it at a target, or somehow utilizing its powers as an attack. This means that you can get some of the effects that you might get from games like <strong>D&D</strong> or <strong>Tunnels & Trolls</strong>, but the tone of the genre would be enforced by the mechanics.</p><p></p><p><strong>Stormbringer</strong> might be the earliest example of using a game's mechanics to enforce the genre of a game's setting.</p><p></p><p>There are flaws to the game. If balance is a concern to you, the options for characters would be an issue. For example, a Melnibonean character that starts play with a couple of bound creatures will be a lot more potent than someone who happens to roll up a beggar. Like with early <strong>Dungeons & Dragons</strong>, the idea is that random character creation is a valve to control relative power level between characters in a group. This isn't going to be for everyone.</p><p></p><p>The other, and to me more major, problem with the game is that it doesn't really do a great job of simulating the world of Moorcock's Elric. I think that first edition <strong>Stormbringer</strong> is one of the single best role-playing games in the dark or weird fantasy genres, but as a Moorcockian RPG based upon the Elric saga, it falls short in a number of ways. The summoning/binding rules are really innovative and interesting (in fact you can see how they influenced Ron Edward's summoning rules in <strong>Sorcerer</strong>), but the rules sort of fall out of step with the source material. There's really nothing in the fiction to demonstrate that the sword Stormbringer is a demon bound into a weapon. Like with many of his concepts, Moorcock shifted and altered what the rune sword was over the course of the Elric stories, but even at the time of the RPG that wasn't how the sword was portrayed in the stories.</p><p></p><p>An argument could be made for the summoning rules, based upon Elric calling up elemental creatures, and even Chaos Lords, during stories but even then the match up isn't perfect. Despite this, they are a favorite part of the game for me, and I like the idea of magic in a game being based around summoning rather than the usual Vancian-derived fire and forget methods of magic.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]80677[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>In 1987, <strong>Games Workshop</strong> put out an edition of <strong>Stormbringer</strong> in the UK. This edition was a book, rather than the two previous boxed sets that <strong>Chaosium</strong> put out. It combined the material from the boxed sets with the <strong>Stormbringer Companion</strong>, an early supplement that had additional creatures for the game, some Melibonean characters of import and some adventures for the game. The <strong>Games Workshop</strong> edition of <strong>Stormbringer</strong> came on the heels of their own entry into RPG publishing with <strong>Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay</strong>. I think that this is important because I have long described <strong>Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay</strong> as being the result of "<strong>Stormbringer</strong> and <strong>Call of Cthulhu</strong> getting <strong>D&D</strong> drunk in an Eastern European tavern." The influence of Michael Moorcock's fiction, and the <strong>Stormbringer</strong> RPG, on the rules and setting of <strong>Warhammer</strong> cannot be understated.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH]80679[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>One last thing that I want to show is the dice from my boxed set. Yes, I never inked them. The first couple of editions of <strong>Stormbringer</strong> come from an era before what we as gamers know as "standard" dice had really been finalized. That is a d20, a d8 and a d6. The d20 would be used for the standard 1-20 rolls, but it was also used as a ten sider and in the case of <strong>Stormbringer</strong> it was used as the percentile dice. You can't tell by looking at it, but instead of being numbered from 1-20, it was numbered from 1-10 twice. The accepted method for inking it, which was a bit of work and the reason why mine is unlinked, was to use two different colors. This way you could use one color for 1-10, and the other for 11-20. This meant less material in the box, making production of the game cheaper as well.</p><p>The d8 also saw double duty as both a d8 and a d4. However, it was numbered from 1-8. You got the 1-4 result by dividing results by half.</p><p></p><p>I was talking recently that I would like to see a return of the double duty d20 die. <a href="http://www.gamesciencedice.com/Gamescience-Smoke--d20-0-9-2x--Twenty-sided-die--Inked_p_25.html" target="_blank">Of course, it turns out that <strong>Gamescience</strong> still makes them</a>. I know what my next dice purchase is going to be.</p><p></p><p>If you're interested in tracking down an edition of the <strong>Stormbringer</strong> game, there are still a number of the 5th edition versions of the <strong>Chaosium</strong> published rules out in the world. You can also still find some of the edition published by <strong>Mongoose</strong>, when they had the license and the rights to the <strong>Runequest</strong> name. I prefer the <strong>Chaosium</strong> editions, and if I had my choice it would either be one of the first editions by <strong>Chaosium</strong>, or the <strong>Games Workshop</strong> version of the game. Everyone has their favorite editions, however.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.stormbringerrpg.com/" target="_blank">There is also a cool <strong>Stormbringer</strong> RPG fansite</a> with a few supplements that fell through the cracks at the end of <strong>Chaosium's</strong> ownership of the license, and a forum where you can discuss the game.</p><p></p><p>Even though I don't like it as much for being an Elric-based role-playing game, I would really like to see <strong>Stormbringer</strong> brought back out to market because I think that it was one of the best dark fantasy role-playing games made. While the 5th edition of <strong>Stormbringer</strong> continues on with a life of sorts as <strong>Chaosium's</strong> game called <strong><a href="http://www.chaosium.com/magic-world-2/" target="_blank">Magic World</a></strong>, if nothing else I would like to see a generic version of the earlier version of the game released as well. There are few games that handle swords and sorcery as well as it did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christopher Helton, post: 7708030, member: 6804772"] [CENTER][ATTACH=CONFIG]80676[/ATTACH][/CENTER] After some online conversations on social media, I decided that I should talk about a few older games and supplements in my column here. I ran a [URL="https://twitter.com/dorkland/status/816386640289599488"]Twitter poll with some options[/URL], some of which I may visit in future pieces, and [B]Stormbringer[/B] came out as a pretty dominating choice. The game took the lead, and kept it throughout the duration of the poll. So, I hauled a couple of [B]Stormbringer[/B] pieces out of my library: the second printing of the first edition [B]Stormbringer[/B] boxed set put out by [B]Chaosium[/B], and the "third edition" book put out by [B]Games Workshop[/B] in the UK.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] [CENTER][ATTACH=CONFIG]80678[/ATTACH][/CENTER] When I put up the poll, I figured that [B]Ghostbusters[/B] would win, hands down. I know that [B]Stormbringer[/B] is a solid game, but I figured that [B]Ghostbusters[/B] would have the more dedicated audience. Considering that both games were the result of the design team at [B]Chaosium[/B], either would have been a win to talk about. [B]Stormbringer[/B] came out from [B]Chaosium[/B] in 1981, with the idea to adapt Michael Moorcock's seminal fantasy anti-hero to role-playing games. In 1977, [B]Chaosium[/B] had already produced a licensed board/war game based on the setting and the character of Elric, and looked to expand their license into RPGs. What was an inspired choice was that, along with in-house designer Steve Perrin, they reached out to [B]Tunnels & Trolls[/B] creator Ken St. Andre to work on the new game. It was an inspired choice because St. Andre really wasn't known for dark role-playing games. Where Moorcock's Elric stories were apocalyptic in tone, and for a long time the standard bearer for the dark fantasy sub-genre, [B]Tunnels and Trolls[/B] isn't. This isn't a knock on [B]Tunnels & Trolls[/B], or St. Andre's work. [B]T&T[/B] is a great game, and the first edition of it was remarkable in a number of ways, but it isn't the game that springs to your lips when looking for rules to run a dark fantasy campaign. Is this collaboration what made [B]Stormbringer[/B] into a game that still gets talked about 35 years later? I think that it is. St. Andre definitely looks at game systems in a different way than a lot of other game designers (yes, this is a compliment) and I think that this perspective is what helped to give the game such a strong foundation. St. Andre and Perrin could have simply reprinted the [B]Runequest[/B] rules with some references to the Young Kingdoms of Elric's world and sat back, waiting for the money to come in. The fact that they didn't shows their strengths as designers. When an RPG publisher has a house system, it is easy enough to just slap a new coat of paint onto it, and sell it as a new game. You see this all the time with licensed role-playing games, particularly at the height of the [B]D20[/B] boom. [B]Stormbringer[/B] wasn't a huge divergence from the core of the [B]Basic Role-Playing[/B] rules, but they took an already simplified set of rules and streamlined them a bit more, particularly in character creation, to make a ruleset that is somewhat different from the main stream. Mechanically, [B]Stormbringer[/B] is based on the [B]Runequest[/B] rules. The basics of character creation (i.e. the attributes used), the working of skills and the rules for task resolution are the same. In theory you could migrate characters between your [B]Stormbringer[/B] and [B]Runequest 2[/B] games, but you would likely run into a few problems with that when you came to magic. Despite the existence of gods, sentient runeblades, Animal Lords and extradimensional elemental creatures, the worlds of [B]Stormbringer[/B] aren't particularly magical places, at least not in the way that fantasy role-playing games tend to look at magic. You don't have clerical spellcasting and healing magic. You don't actually have magic-using spell casters at all. The magic in [B]Stormbringer[/B] is built around the idea of summoning extradimensional beings, whether chaos demons or elemental beings, and either channeling their power into some sort of spell-like function, or binding them into items that protect the user or allows some access to the bound creature's powers. You could do something like a fireball in a [B]Stormbringer[/B] game, it would just take summoning a fire elemental and "throwing" it at a target, or somehow utilizing its powers as an attack. This means that you can get some of the effects that you might get from games like [B]D&D[/B] or [B]Tunnels & Trolls[/B], but the tone of the genre would be enforced by the mechanics. [B]Stormbringer[/B] might be the earliest example of using a game's mechanics to enforce the genre of a game's setting. There are flaws to the game. If balance is a concern to you, the options for characters would be an issue. For example, a Melnibonean character that starts play with a couple of bound creatures will be a lot more potent than someone who happens to roll up a beggar. Like with early [B]Dungeons & Dragons[/B], the idea is that random character creation is a valve to control relative power level between characters in a group. This isn't going to be for everyone. The other, and to me more major, problem with the game is that it doesn't really do a great job of simulating the world of Moorcock's Elric. I think that first edition [B]Stormbringer[/B] is one of the single best role-playing games in the dark or weird fantasy genres, but as a Moorcockian RPG based upon the Elric saga, it falls short in a number of ways. The summoning/binding rules are really innovative and interesting (in fact you can see how they influenced Ron Edward's summoning rules in [B]Sorcerer[/B]), but the rules sort of fall out of step with the source material. There's really nothing in the fiction to demonstrate that the sword Stormbringer is a demon bound into a weapon. Like with many of his concepts, Moorcock shifted and altered what the rune sword was over the course of the Elric stories, but even at the time of the RPG that wasn't how the sword was portrayed in the stories. An argument could be made for the summoning rules, based upon Elric calling up elemental creatures, and even Chaos Lords, during stories but even then the match up isn't perfect. Despite this, they are a favorite part of the game for me, and I like the idea of magic in a game being based around summoning rather than the usual Vancian-derived fire and forget methods of magic. [CENTER][ATTACH=CONFIG]80677[/ATTACH][/CENTER] In 1987, [B]Games Workshop[/B] put out an edition of [B]Stormbringer[/B] in the UK. This edition was a book, rather than the two previous boxed sets that [B]Chaosium[/B] put out. It combined the material from the boxed sets with the [B]Stormbringer Companion[/B], an early supplement that had additional creatures for the game, some Melibonean characters of import and some adventures for the game. The [B]Games Workshop[/B] edition of [B]Stormbringer[/B] came on the heels of their own entry into RPG publishing with [B]Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay[/B]. I think that this is important because I have long described [B]Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay[/B] as being the result of "[B]Stormbringer[/B] and [B]Call of Cthulhu[/B] getting [B]D&D[/B] drunk in an Eastern European tavern." The influence of Michael Moorcock's fiction, and the [B]Stormbringer[/B] RPG, on the rules and setting of [B]Warhammer[/B] cannot be understated. [CENTER][ATTACH=CONFIG]80679[/ATTACH][/CENTER] One last thing that I want to show is the dice from my boxed set. Yes, I never inked them. The first couple of editions of [B]Stormbringer[/B] come from an era before what we as gamers know as "standard" dice had really been finalized. That is a d20, a d8 and a d6. The d20 would be used for the standard 1-20 rolls, but it was also used as a ten sider and in the case of [B]Stormbringer[/B] it was used as the percentile dice. You can't tell by looking at it, but instead of being numbered from 1-20, it was numbered from 1-10 twice. The accepted method for inking it, which was a bit of work and the reason why mine is unlinked, was to use two different colors. This way you could use one color for 1-10, and the other for 11-20. This meant less material in the box, making production of the game cheaper as well. The d8 also saw double duty as both a d8 and a d4. However, it was numbered from 1-8. You got the 1-4 result by dividing results by half. I was talking recently that I would like to see a return of the double duty d20 die. [URL="http://www.gamesciencedice.com/Gamescience-Smoke--d20-0-9-2x--Twenty-sided-die--Inked_p_25.html"]Of course, it turns out that [B]Gamescience[/B] still makes them[/URL]. I know what my next dice purchase is going to be. If you're interested in tracking down an edition of the [B]Stormbringer[/B] game, there are still a number of the 5th edition versions of the [B]Chaosium[/B] published rules out in the world. You can also still find some of the edition published by [B]Mongoose[/B], when they had the license and the rights to the [B]Runequest[/B] name. I prefer the [B]Chaosium[/B] editions, and if I had my choice it would either be one of the first editions by [B]Chaosium[/B], or the [B]Games Workshop[/B] version of the game. Everyone has their favorite editions, however. [URL="http://www.stormbringerrpg.com/"]There is also a cool [B]Stormbringer[/B] RPG fansite[/URL] with a few supplements that fell through the cracks at the end of [B]Chaosium's[/B] ownership of the license, and a forum where you can discuss the game. Even though I don't like it as much for being an Elric-based role-playing game, I would really like to see [B]Stormbringer[/B] brought back out to market because I think that it was one of the best dark fantasy role-playing games made. While the 5th edition of [B]Stormbringer[/B] continues on with a life of sorts as [B]Chaosium's[/B] game called [B][URL="http://www.chaosium.com/magic-world-2/"]Magic World[/URL][/B], if nothing else I would like to see a generic version of the earlier version of the game released as well. There are few games that handle swords and sorcery as well as it did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Looking Back At Chaosium's Stormbringer Role-Playing Game
Top